This map shows the geographic impact of Shane Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shane Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shane Barnes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shane Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shane Barnes. The network helps show where Shane Barnes may publish in the future.
International Social Work·Judith Norman, Zita Bathori-Tartsi, Shane Barnes
2008
0
About Shane Barnes
Shane Barnes is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, History and Philosophy of Science, Information Systems and Management and Safety Research, having authored 4 papers that have together received 523 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (1 paper), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (1 paper), Philosophy and History of Science (1 paper), Child Welfare and Adoption (1 paper) and Employment and Welfare Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (126 citations), General Psychology (15 citations), Sociology and Political Science (222 citations), Philosophy (54 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (43 citations). Shane Barnes has collaborated with scholars based in Ukraine and United States. Their work appears in journals such as International Social Work and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.