Seth Latimer

404 citations
12 papers · 320 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Seth Latimer

12 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Seth Latimer
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Clinical Psychology 102
  • General Health Professions 77
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 40
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 62
  • Health Informatics 3
Replace Abigail J. Rolbiecki with:
Abigail J. Rolbiecki United States
Francine deMontigny Canada
Shahar Shapira Israel
Imogen O'Neill Australia
Laura Guidry‐Grimes United States
Nauman Siddiqi United States
Vibeke Østergaard Steenfeldt Denmark
Roberta Bivins United Kingdom
F.M. de Graaff Netherlands
Sarah Alonzi United States
Seth Latimer relative to Abigail J. Rolbiecki United States Abigail J. Rolbiecki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Abigail J. Rolbiecki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Seth Latimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Seth Latimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Seth Latimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seth Latimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Seth Latimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Seth Latimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Seth Latimer. The network helps show where Seth Latimer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Seth Latimer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Seth Latimer Line = papers co-authored together Seth Latimer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201098
2 201150
3 201149
4 201734
5 201721
6 201020
7 201616
8 201614
9 20127
10 20147
11 20152
12 20112

About Seth Latimer

Seth Latimer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Mental Health via Writing (1 paper), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper) and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (102 citations), General Health Professions (77 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (40 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (62 citations) and Health Informatics (3 citations). Seth Latimer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kristin G. Cloyes, Bob Wong, Margaret F. Clayton, Maija Reblin, Lee Ellington, Leonard J. Haas, Todd W. Dunn, Debra Roter, Kimberly M. Kelly and Gary Donaldson. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, Clinical Toxicology, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Public Health Genomics and Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact