Sérgio Ide

458 citations
38 papers · 368 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Sérgio Ide

33 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

Sérgio Ide
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Paleontology 151
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 169
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 99
  • Insect Science 98
  • Forestry 28
Replace Alejandro Lopera-Toro with:
Alejandro Lopera-Toro Colombia
Marcelo D. Arana Argentina
Ángel Solís Costa Rica
Fernando A. B. Silva Brazil
Cuauhtémoc Deloya Mexico
Paul E. Skelley United States
Patricia Rojas Mexico
Diogo Andrade Costa Brazil
Federico C. Ocampo Argentina
Marı́a L. De Wysiecki Argentina
Sérgio Ide relative to Alejandro Lopera-Toro Colombia Alejandro Lopera-Toro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Alejandro Lopera-Toro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sérgio Ide

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sérgio Ide's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sérgio Ide with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sérgio Ide more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sérgio Ide

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sérgio Ide. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sérgio Ide. The network helps show where Sérgio Ide may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sérgio Ide, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sérgio Ide Line = papers co-authored together Sérgio Ide links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Insetos Imaturos: Metamorfose e Identificação
200673
2 200743
3 199930
4 200825
5 201319
6 201318
7 200816
8 200316
9 200615
10 201512
11 200912
12 200010
13 20109
14 20088
15 20148
16 20147
17 20126
18 20136
19 20125
20
Diagnóstico del conocimiento de las principales colecciones brasileñas de Coleoptera
20004

About Sérgio Ide

Sérgio Ide is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Paleontology, Insect Science, Plant Science and Genetics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 368 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography (17 papers), Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (10 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (7 papers), Plant and soil sciences (6 papers), Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies (5 papers), Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (151 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (169 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (99 citations), Insect Science (98 citations) and Forestry (28 citations). Sérgio Ide has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Australia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Cleide Costa, Sérgio Roberto Rodrigues, Malva Isabel Medina Hernández, Francisco Jorge Cividanes, Fernando A. B. Silva, Rita de Cássia de Moura, Alfredo Raúl Abot, Sérgio A. Vanin, Anderson Puker and John F. Lawrence. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the Entomological Society of America, Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Bragantia, Crop Protection and Systematic Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact