Scott Schatz
Impact in
- Endocrinology top 5%
- Legionella and Acanthamoeba research
- Vibrio bacteria research studies
- Ophthalmology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Marine and coastal plant biology 7
- Marine Biology and Ecology Research 3
-
- Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases 7
- Co-authors
- Andrew Rogerson (6 shared papers)Megan E. Shoff (4 shared papers)Jan Kohlmeyer (2 shared papers)D.V. Seal (3 shared papers)Catherine M. Vogel (1 shared paper)Jack W. Fell (1 shared paper)David Seal (1 shared paper)Baichuan Jiang (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Mycologia (6 papers)Optometry and Vision Science (5 papers)Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (3 papers)Clinical and Experimental Optometry (2 papers)Acta Protozoologica (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSpain
In The Last Decade
Scott Schatz
29 papers receiving 349 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Endocrinology 120
- Ophthalmology 50
- Cell Biology 83
- Oceanography 42
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 38
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Schatz
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Schatz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Schatz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Schatz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Schatz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Schatz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Schatz. The network helps show where Scott Schatz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Scott Schatz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 73 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 69 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 35 | |
| 5 | 1985 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 16 | |
| 7 | 1987 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1984 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 11 | |
| 10 | Post-streptococcal uveitis. | 2000 | 10 |
| 11 | 2003 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1985 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1984 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1980 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1983 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 3 |
About Scott Schatz
Scott Schatz is a scholar working on Oceanography, Cell Biology, Endocrinology, Ophthalmology and Plant Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and coastal plant biology (7 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (7 papers), Legionella and Acanthamoeba research (5 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (3 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (2 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (2 papers) and Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (120 citations), Ophthalmology (50 citations), Cell Biology (83 citations), Oceanography (42 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (38 citations). Scott Schatz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Rogerson, Megan E. Shoff, Jan Kohlmeyer, D.V. Seal, Catherine M. Vogel, Jack W. Fell, David Seal, Baichuan Jiang, Brad M. Bebout and Robert D. Barr. Their work appears in journals such as Mycologia, Optometry and Vision Science, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Clinical and Experimental Optometry and Acta Protozoologica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.