Scott R. Docherty

981 citations
34 papers · 735 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Scott R. Docherty

31 papers receiving 699 citations

Peers

Scott R. Docherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Catalysis 345
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 124
  • Inorganic Chemistry 166
  • Materials Chemistry 370
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 124
Replace Hai lin Dong with:
Hai lin Dong China
Simin Yu China
Stuart A. Bartlett United Kingdom
Kellie Jenkinson Belgium
Eliana Rocchini Italy
Sarah E. Specht United States
Ágnes Szécsényi Netherlands
Viktor John Cybulskis United States
Konrad Möbus Germany
Thomas E. Webber United States
Scott R. Docherty relative to Hai lin Dong China Hai lin Dong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.9×
Hai lin Dong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott R. Docherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott R. Docherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott R. Docherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott R. Docherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott R. Docherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott R. Docherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott R. Docherty. The network helps show where Scott R. Docherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott R. Docherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott R. Docherty Line = papers co-authored together Scott R. Docherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202196
2 202188
3 202382
4 201779
5 202157
6 201847
7 202336
8 202231
9 202231
10 201925
11 202323
12 202318
13 202515
14 202414
15 202314
16 202313
17 202411
18 20228
19 20238
20 20247

About Scott R. Docherty

Scott R. Docherty is a scholar working on Catalysis, Process Chemistry and Technology, Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, having authored 34 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (15 papers), Catalysts for Methane Reforming (10 papers), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (7 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (6 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (4 papers), CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts (3 papers) and Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (345 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (124 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (166 citations), Materials Chemistry (370 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (124 citations). Scott R. Docherty has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Christophe Copéret, Lukas Rochlitz, Pierre‐Adrien Payard, Оlga V. Safonova, Alexander Yakimov, Erwin Lam, Weichen Cao, Gina A. Noh, Nate W. J. Ang and Jamie H. Docherty. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Helvetica Chimica Acta, Chemical Science, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C and Catalysis Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact