Scott Meyer

582 citations
42 papers · 479 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Meyer

39 papers receiving 460 citations

Peers

Scott Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 142
  • Computational Mechanics 284
  • Aerospace Engineering 297
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 56
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 32
Replace Edward Coy with:
Edward Coy United States
Fei Xing China
Emeric Daniau France
Yizhuo He China
M. Mawid United States
John L. Pagliaro United States
I. S. Yakovenko Russia
N. Meynet France
Tsarng-Sheng Cheng Taiwan
Makoto Asahara Japan
Scott Meyer relative to Edward Coy United States Edward Coy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Edward Coy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Meyer. The network helps show where Scott Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Scott Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201644
2 201438
3 201738
4 201832
5 201030
6 201226
7 201621
8 201021
9 201920
10 200719
11 200216
12 201215
13 200713
14 201713
15 201912
16 201712
17 201110
18 20129
19 20108
20 20027

About Scott Meyer

Scott Meyer is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Mechanics of Materials and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 42 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (18 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (14 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (12 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (12 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (8 papers), Heat transfer and supercritical fluids (5 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (3 papers) and Fire dynamics and safety research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (142 citations), Computational Mechanics (284 citations), Aerospace Engineering (297 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (56 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (32 citations). Scott Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Robert P. Lucht, Stephen D. Heister, Carson D. Slabaugh, Timothée L. Pourpoint, Jay P. Gore, Mark C. Grubelich, Francesco Nasuti, Marco Pizzarelli, Rohan Gejji and Francesco Battista. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Scientific Instruments, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Measurement Science and Technology and Science and Engineering Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact