Scott Lavery
Impact in
- Finance top 5%
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
- Global Financial Regulation and Crises
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
-
- Political and Economic history of UK and US
- Social Policy and Reform Studies
- European Union Policy and Governance
Papers in
-
- Political and Economic history of UK and US 8
- Social Policy and Reform Studies 4
- Regional Development and Policy 3
- European Union Policy and Governance 2
- Finance 9
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism 8
- Global Financial Regulation and Crises 1
- Co-authors
- Jeremy Green (2 shared papers)Tom Hunt (2 shared papers)Lucia Quaglia (2 shared papers)Craig Berry (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- New Political Economy (4 papers)Journal of European Public Policy (1 paper)JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies (1 paper)Politics and Governance (1 paper)Geoforum (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyPortugal
In The Last Decade
Scott Lavery
16 papers receiving 248 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Finance 136
- Political Science and International Relations 141
- Strategy and Management 61
- General Energy 4
- Urban Studies 23
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Lavery
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Lavery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Lavery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Lavery more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Lavery
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Lavery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Lavery. The network helps show where Scott Lavery may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Scott Lavery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 41 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 9 | UK Regions and European Structural and Investment Funds | 2016 | 6 |
| 10 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2026 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 16 | UK Regions, the European Union and Manufacturing Exports | 2016 | 1 |
About Scott Lavery
Scott Lavery is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Finance, Strategy and Management, Urban Studies and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (8 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (8 papers), State Capitalism and Financial Governance (6 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers), Regional Development and Policy (3 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (2 papers), Global Financial Regulation and Crises (1 paper) and Innovation Policy and R&D (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (136 citations), Political Science and International Relations (141 citations), Strategy and Management (61 citations), General Energy (4 citations) and Urban Studies (23 citations). Scott Lavery has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Green, Tom Hunt, Lucia Quaglia and Craig Berry. Their work appears in journals such as New Political Economy, Journal of European Public Policy, JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies, Politics and Governance and Geoforum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.