Scott Kruger

1.8k citations
57 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Kruger

53 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Scott Kruger
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.0k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 769
  • Aerospace Engineering 161
  • Condensed Matter Physics 71
  • Biomedical Engineering 200
Replace Guillaume Latu with:
Guillaume Latu France
Yasuhiro Idomura Japan
D. D. Schnack United States
A. M. Dimits United States
C. R. Sovinec United States
W. W. Lee United States
L. A. Berry United States
A. Bottino Germany
Egemen Kolemen United States
V. Grandgirard France
Scott Kruger relative to Guillaume Latu France Guillaume Latu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Guillaume Latu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Kruger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Kruger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Kruger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Kruger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Kruger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Kruger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Kruger. The network helps show where Scott Kruger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Kruger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Kruger Line = papers co-authored together Scott Kruger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003398
2 200362
3 200361
4 200555
5 200254
6 200650
7 202245
8 202139
9 201038
10 200736
11 199833
12 200429
13 199824
14 200223
15 200522
16 200521
17 201020
18 201319
19 200618
20 200517

About Scott Kruger

Scott Kruger is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (47 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (25 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (12 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (11 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (10 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (10 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (6 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.0k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (769 citations), Aerospace Engineering (161 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (71 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (200 citations). Scott Kruger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include C. R. Sovinec, D. D. Schnack, T. A. Gianakon, M. S. Chu, C. C. Hegna, A. H. Glasser, Alfonso G. Tarditi, Richard Nebel, D. C. Barnes and Steven J. Plimpton. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Nuclear Fusion, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Computing in Science & Engineering and Computer Physics Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact