Scott Freeman

1.2k citations
32 papers · 566 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Freeman

28 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

Scott Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 218
  • Finance 127
  • Economics and Econometrics 301
  • Sociology and Political Science 119
  • General Decision Sciences 4
Replace Jihad Dagher with:
Jihad Dagher United States
Christopher J. Niggle United States
Patrizio Tirelli Italy
Suleiman Abu‐Bader Israel
José de Sousa France
Richard H. Timberlake United States
Giampaolo Galli Italy
Élisabeth Huybens United States
Előd Takáts Switzerland
Nadir Öcal Türkiye
Scott Freeman relative to Jihad Dagher United States Jihad Dagher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Jihad Dagher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Freeman. The network helps show where Scott Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Scott Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Scott Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199690
2 199655
3 200055
4 199641
5 198839
6 198736
7 199926
8 199123
9 198522
10 198522
11 199918
12 200118
13 199916
14 199315
15 199212
16 198611
17 199111
18 19899
19 19999
20
Money, Output, and the Nominal National Debt
19908

About Scott Freeman

Scott Freeman is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Sociology and Political Science and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 32 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (23 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (15 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (5 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (3 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (2 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (1 paper), Crime Patterns and Interventions (1 paper) and Income, Poverty, and Inequality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (218 citations), Finance (127 citations), Economics and Econometrics (301 citations), Sociology and Political Science (119 citations) and General Decision Sciences (4 citations). Scott Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jon C. Sonstelie, Jeffrey T. Grogger, Finn E. Kydland, Bruce A. Champ, Gregory W. Huffman, Era Dabla‐Norris, Joseph H. Haslag, Stephen Polasky, Guido Tabellini and Dan Peled. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Monetary Economics, Journal of Political Economy, Review of Economic Dynamics, Journal of money credit and banking and Economic Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact