Scott DeBoer

32 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers

Scott DeBoer
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Emergency Medical Services 65
  • Cultural Studies 66
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 27
  • Emergency Medicine 39
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 13
Replace Michelle I. Hinson with:
Michelle I. Hinson United States
Tobias Everett Canada
Robyn Wing United States
Jason Heard United States
Luis García-Castrillo Riesgo Spain
Kamal Abulebda United States
Theane Theophilos Australia
Hartwig Marung Germany
Fatma Demi̇r Korkmaz Türkiye
Sultan Al‐Shaqsi Oman
Scott DeBoer relative to Michelle I. Hinson United States Michelle I. Hinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Michelle I. Hinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott DeBoer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott DeBoer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott DeBoer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott DeBoer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott DeBoer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott DeBoer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott DeBoer. The network helps show where Scott DeBoer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Scott DeBoer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott DeBoer Line = papers co-authored together Scott DeBoer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200996
2 200840
3 200528
4 200326
5 200711
6 200111
7
Body piercing and airway management: photo guide to tongue jewelry removal techniques.
200811
8 20049
9 20069
10 20088
11 20016
12
Intraosseous infusion: not just for kids anymore.
20056
13
Burn care in EMS.
20045
14 20113
15 20043
16 20083
17 20063
18 19993
19 20022
20 20062

About Scott DeBoer

Scott DeBoer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Emergency Medicine, Cultural Studies, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Surgery, having authored 39 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications (11 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (10 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (9 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (7 papers), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (4 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (3 papers) and Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (65 citations), Cultural Studies (66 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (27 citations), Emergency Medicine (39 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (13 citations). Scott DeBoer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Barbara L. Shultz, Reneé Semonin Holleran, Myrna L. Armstrong, Frank Cetta, James Broselow, Lisa Peterson, Walter J. Chwals, Christopher M. Straus, Amir Vardi and Nicolas Kluger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Emergency Nursing, Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal, Air Medical Journal, Pediatric Emergency Care and Journal of Trauma Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact