Scott D. Piper

602 citations
12 papers · 442 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 7
    • Avian ecology and behavior 5
    • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 3
    • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes 1
    • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 5

Scott D. Piper

12 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

Scott D. Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Ecological Modeling 99
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 250
  • Ecology 295
  • Global and Planetary Change 143
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 79
Replace Jocelyn Fonderflick with:
Jocelyn Fonderflick France
Myung‐Bok Lee China
Lotten J. Johansson Sweden
Rocco Labadessa Italy
Kathi L. Borgmann United States
Adam Kimberley Sweden
Jennifer M. Fill United States
Paul D. McBride New Zealand
Christine Römermann Germany
G.A. Benn South Africa
Scott D. Piper relative to Jocelyn Fonderflick France Jocelyn Fonderflick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jocelyn Fonderflick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott D. Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott D. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott D. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott D. Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott D. Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott D. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott D. Piper. The network helps show where Scott D. Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Scott D. Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott D. Piper Line = papers co-authored together Scott D. Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2003110
2 200683
3 200161
4 201048
5 200437
6 200830
7 200523
8 200517
9 200915
10 20017
11 20066
12 20045

About Scott D. Piper

Scott D. Piper is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change and Social Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 442 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (5 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (3 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (1 paper), Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (99 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (250 citations), Ecology (295 citations), Global and Planetary Change (143 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (79 citations). Scott D. Piper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Carla P. Catterall, John Kanowski, Michael Arthur, Stuart E. Bunn, Gayle C. Johnson and H. C. Proctor. Their work appears in journals such as Austral Ecology, Emu - Austral Ornithology, Restoration Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation and Forest Ecology and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact