Scott D. Piper
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
- Ecology 10
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 8
- Avian ecology and behavior 5
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 3
- Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation 1
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 6
- Co-authors
- Carla P. Catterall (14 shared papers)John Kanowski (4 shared papers)James Michael Arthur (2 shared papers)Stuart Edward Bunn (2 shared papers)Gayle C. Johnson (1 shared paper)Heather C. Proctor (1 shared paper)David Alex Lamb (1 shared paper)Grant Wardell‐Johnson (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Scott D. Piper
14 papers receiving 446 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Ecological Modeling 106
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 278
- Ecology 331
- Global and Planetary Change 159
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 88
Countries citing papers authored by Scott D. Piper
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott D. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott D. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott D. Piper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott D. Piper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott D. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott D. Piper. The network helps show where Scott D. Piper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Scott D. Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 116 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 90 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 24 | |
| 8 | Noisy miner irruptions associated with land use by humans in south east Queensland: causes, effects and management implications | 2002 | 18 |
| 9 | 2005 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 15 | |
| 11 | Rainforest timber plantations and the restoration of plant biodiversity in tropical and subtropical Australia | 2005 | 8 |
| 12 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 5 |
About Scott D. Piper
Scott D. Piper is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change and Forestry, having authored 14 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (5 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (3 papers), Mining and Resource Management (1 paper), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (1 paper) and Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (106 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (278 citations), Ecology (331 citations), Global and Planetary Change (159 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (88 citations). Scott D. Piper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Carla P. Catterall, John Kanowski, James Michael Arthur, Stuart Edward Bunn, Gayle C. Johnson, Heather C. Proctor, David Alex Lamb and Grant Wardell‐Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Austral Ecology, Emu - Austral Ornithology, Oikos, Restoration Ecology and Diversity and Distributions.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.