Scott Collier

1.0k citations
21 papers · 543 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Collier

21 papers receiving 537 citations

Peers

Scott Collier
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Computational Mathematics 31
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 467
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 215
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 241
  • Geometry and Topology 93
Replace Aldo Riello with:
Aldo Riello Canada
Sylvain Carrozza France
Vasco Gonçalves Portugal
Shouvik Datta Switzerland
Ran Yacoby United States
Dine Ousmane Samary Benin
Henry Maxfield United States
Badis Ydri Algeria
Konstantin Alkalaev Russia
Sridip Pal United States
Scott Collier relative to Aldo Riello Canada Aldo Riello's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Aldo Riello · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Collier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Collier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Collier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Collier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Collier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Collier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Collier. The network helps show where Scott Collier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Scott Collier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Collier Line = papers co-authored together Scott Collier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202286
2 201963
3 201860
4 202351
5 202245
6 202441
7 202033
8 201928
9 201925
10 202422
11 202218
12 202313
13 202513
14 202511
15 202310
16 20257
17 20256
18 20254
19 20254
20 20122

About Scott Collier

Scott Collier is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Geometry and Topology and Mathematical Physics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (19 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (10 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (7 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (5 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (3 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (3 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (31 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (467 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (215 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (241 citations) and Geometry and Topology (93 citations). Scott Collier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Xi Yin, Lorenz Eberhardt, Eric Perlmutter, Alexander Maloney, Beatrix Mühlmann, Thomas E. Hartman, Ying-Hsuan Lin, Henry Maxfield, Nathan Benjamin and Jorrit Kruthoff. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, SciPost Physics, Physical Review Letters, OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) and RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact