Scott Chase

47 papers receiving 633 citations

Peers

Scott Chase
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Architecture 135
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 230
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 108
  • Mechanical Engineering 399
  • Building and Construction 137
Replace Ming Xi Tang with:
Ming Xi Tang Hong Kong
Ulrich Flemming United States
Robert Aish United Kingdom
John Frazer Hong Kong
Matt R. Bohm United States
Offer Shai Israel
Thomas P. Bligh United Kingdom
Teng-Wen Chang Taiwan
Ferruccio Mandorli Italy
Jonathan C. Borg Malta
Scott Chase relative to Ming Xi Tang Hong Kong Ming Xi Tang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Ming Xi Tang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Chase

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Chase's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Chase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Chase more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Chase

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Chase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Chase. The network helps show where Scott Chase may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Scott Chase, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Chase Line = papers co-authored together Scott Chase links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199981
2 200977
3 200270
4 198964
5 200557
6 201253
7 199147
8 199126
9 199325
10 199124
11 199119
12 200711
13 200810
14 199610
15
Designing for the 21st century: interdisciplinary methods and findings
20099
16 20088
17 20098
18 20087
19 20127
20 20126

About Scott Chase

Scott Chase is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Architecture, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications and Social Psychology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Design Education and Practice (32 papers), Architecture and Computational Design (16 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (10 papers), Color perception and design (9 papers), Product Development and Customization (8 papers), Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (6 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (5 papers) and Advanced Database Systems and Queries (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Architecture (135 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (230 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (108 citations), Mechanical Engineering (399 citations) and Building and Construction (137 citations). Scott Chase has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Charles M. Eastman, Alan H. Bond, Linda C. Schmidt, Sungwoo Lim, Iestyn Jowers, Alison McKay, Kristina Shea, Steve Garner, Robert Macfarlane and Nicholas T. Zervas. Their work appears in journals such as Automation in Construction, Environment and Planning B Planning and Design, Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing, Research in Engineering Design and Design Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact