Scott Chase

38 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers

Scott Chase
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Architecture 89
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 177
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 82
  • Mechanical Engineering 300
  • Building and Construction 107
Replace Ulrich Flemming with:
Ulrich Flemming United States
Robert Aish United Kingdom
John Frazer Hong Kong
Matt R. Bohm United States
Offer Shai Israel
António Leitão Portugal
Santiago Timoteo Puente Méndez Spain
Thomas P. Bligh United Kingdom
Ferruccio Mandorli Italy
Teng-Wen Chang Taiwan
Scott Chase relative to Ulrich Flemming United States Ulrich Flemming's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Ulrich Flemming · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Chase

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Chase's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Chase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Chase more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Chase

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Chase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Chase. The network helps show where Scott Chase may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Scott Chase, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Chase Line = papers co-authored together Scott Chase links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199970
2 200960
3 200255
4 200552
5 198950
6 201243
7 199136
8 199323
9 199117
10 199116
11 200711
12 20089
13 19967
14 20086
15
Designing for the 21st century: interdisciplinary methods and findings
20096
16 20126
17 20096
18 20105
19 20034
20 20064

About Scott Chase

Scott Chase is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Architecture, Social Psychology, Computer Networks and Communications and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 41 papers that have together received 525 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Design Education and Practice (27 papers), Architecture and Computational Design (13 papers), Color perception and design (8 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (7 papers), Product Development and Customization (6 papers), Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (5 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (3 papers) and Optics and Image Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Architecture (89 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (177 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (82 citations), Mechanical Engineering (300 citations) and Building and Construction (107 citations). Scott Chase has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Charles M. Eastman, Linda C. Schmidt, Alan H. Bond, Sungwoo Lim, Iestyn Jowers, Alison McKay, Kristina Shea, Steve Garner, Christopher J. Owen and Robert Macfarlane. Their work appears in journals such as Automation in Construction, Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing, Environment and Planning B Planning and Design, Research in Engineering Design and Journal of Information Technology in Construction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact