Scott Breitinger

18 papers receiving 236 citations

Peers

Scott Breitinger
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Applied Psychology 80
  • Health Informatics 6
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 119
  • General Health Professions 87
  • Clinical Psychology 63
Replace Meghan McDarby with:
Meghan McDarby United States
Wei-Jean Chung United States
Kristine M. Johnson United States
Peter Hoang Canada
Jessica Marian Goodman‐Casanova Spain
Phillip A. Ianni United States
Seyedmohammad Mirhosseini Iran
Patrick Hammett United States
Jasmin Steinbach Germany
Jonathan Avery United States
Scott Breitinger relative to Meghan McDarby United States Meghan McDarby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Meghan McDarby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Breitinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Breitinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Breitinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Breitinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Breitinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Breitinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Breitinger. The network helps show where Scott Breitinger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Breitinger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Breitinger Line = papers co-authored together Scott Breitinger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202083
2 202165
3 201934
4 202311
5 20209
6 20207
7 20226
8 20245
9 20234
10 20224
11 20254
12 20243
13 20253
14 20223
15 20232
16 20241
17 20241
18 20251
19 20240
20 20240

About Scott Breitinger

Scott Breitinger is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 21 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (8 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (5 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (80 citations), Health Informatics (6 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (119 citations), General Health Professions (87 citations) and Clinical Psychology (63 citations). Scott Breitinger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Melanie T. Gentry, Tyler Oesterle, Donald M. Hilty, Mark A. Frye, Larissa L. Loukianova, Mohit Chauhan, Mark S. Gold, Daniel K. Hall‐Flavin, Teresa A. Rummans and Amit Sheth. Their work appears in journals such as Mayo Clinic Proceedings, American Journal on Addictions, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, Journal of Affective Disorders and Journal of the American Heart Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact