Scott Askin
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Information Management top 10%
Papers in
-
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 5
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 4
- Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy 1
- Co-authors
- Francesca Cerreta (2 shared papers)Armin Ritzhaupt (2 shared papers)Yared Santa‐Ana‐Téllez (1 shared paper)Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel (1 shared paper)Tim De Smedt (2 shared papers)Anthonius de Boer (1 shared paper)Mira G. P. Zuidgeest (2 shared papers)Helga Rún Garðarsdóttir (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2 papers)Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (1 paper)npj Digital Medicine (1 paper)Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (1 paper)BMC Medical Research Methodology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Scott Askin
5 papers receiving 347 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Health Informatics 80
- Health Information Management 22
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 71
- Family Practice 4
- Statistics and Probability 19
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Askin
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Askin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Askin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Askin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Askin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Askin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Askin. The network helps show where Scott Askin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Askin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 171 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 74 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 0 |
About Scott Askin
Scott Askin is a scholar working on Physiology, Economics and Econometrics, Health Informatics, Immunology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 7 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (2 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (1 paper), Science, Research, and Medicine (1 paper) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (80 citations), Health Information Management (22 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (71 citations), Family Practice (4 citations) and Statistics and Probability (19 citations). Scott Askin has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Francesca Cerreta, Armin Ritzhaupt, Yared Santa‐Ana‐Téllez, Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel, Tim De Smedt, Anthonius de Boer, Mira G. P. Zuidgeest, Helga Rún Garðarsdóttir, Spiros Vamvakas and Michael Berntgen. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, npj Digital Medicine, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery and BMC Medical Research Methodology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.