Scot Mathieson

10 papers receiving 202 citations

Peers

Scot Mathieson
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Global and Planetary Change 132
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 68
  • Ecology 112
  • Aquatic Science 29
  • Oceanography 37
Replace Gabriel Barros Gonçalves de Souza with:
Gabriel Barros Gonçalves de Souza Brazil
M. Girardin France
Francisco Carvalho Portugal
José Eduardo Rebelo Portugal
Joseph H. Tarnecki United States
María Eva Góngora Argentina
Lesa Meng United States
Max Louis Guadeloupe
Néstor Hernando Campos Colombia
Scot Mathieson relative to Gabriel Barros Gonçalves de Souza Brazil Gabriel Barros Gonçalves de Souza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gabriel Barros Gonçalves de Souza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scot Mathieson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scot Mathieson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scot Mathieson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scot Mathieson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scot Mathieson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scot Mathieson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scot Mathieson. The network helps show where Scot Mathieson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scot Mathieson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scot Mathieson Line = papers co-authored together Scot Mathieson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2000113
2 201424
3 199717
4 202212
5 199611
6 199510
7 201910
8 19988
9 19876
10 19955

About Scot Mathieson

Scot Mathieson is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Aquatic Science and Oceanography, having authored 10 papers that have together received 216 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (3 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (2 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (2 papers), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (2 papers), Crustacean biology and ecology (2 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (2 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (2 papers) and Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (132 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (68 citations), Ecology (112 citations), Aquatic Science (29 citations) and Oceanography (37 citations). Scot Mathieson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Pilar Drake, Michael Elliott, Justine Marchand, María José Costa, A. Cattrijsse, James E. Gardner, A.J. Berry, Donald S. McLusky, Elizabeth Pinkard and Brian J. Bett. Their work appears in journals such as Marine Ecology Progress Series, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Journal of Environmental Management, Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research and Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact