S.C.O.M. de Sousa

11 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers

S.C.O.M. de Sousa
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • General Dentistry 35
  • Periodontics 45
  • Dermatology 75
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 107
  • Rehabilitation 19
Replace Roman Šmucler with:
Roman Šmucler Czechia
Behzad Iranmanesh Iran
Abhishek Ananthanarayanan Singapore
Mariéllen Longo Brazil
Sabine Jurge United Kingdom
Rezvan Amiri Iran
Darius Sandu Romania
Chamila Panduwawala Hong Kong
Girish Suragimath India
Somayeh Rahmani Iran
S.C.O.M. de Sousa relative to Roman Šmucler Czechia Roman Šmucler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Roman Šmucler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S.C.O.M. de Sousa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S.C.O.M. de Sousa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S.C.O.M. de Sousa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S.C.O.M. de Sousa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S.C.O.M. de Sousa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S.C.O.M. de Sousa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S.C.O.M. de Sousa. The network helps show where S.C.O.M. de Sousa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S.C.O.M. de Sousa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S.C.O.M. de Sousa Line = papers co-authored together S.C.O.M. de Sousa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201069
2 202065
3 201463
4 201230
5 201429
6 201521
7 201914
8 200311
9 20175
10 20112
11 20191

About S.C.O.M. de Sousa

S.C.O.M. de Sousa is a scholar working on Surgery, Dermatology, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (2 papers), Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (2 papers), COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (1 paper), Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas (1 paper), Cancer Research and Treatments (1 paper), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (1 paper) and Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Dentistry (35 citations), Periodontics (45 citations), Dermatology (75 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (107 citations) and Rehabilitation (19 citations). S.C.O.M. de Sousa has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Felipe Fornias Sperandio, Luciana Côrrea, Ana Cecília Corrêa Aranha, Alyne Simões, Michael R. Hamblin, Fernanda Salgueiredo Giudice, Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva, Sara Costa Gomes, Thaís Mauad and João Renato Rebello Pinho. Their work appears in journals such as Histopathology, Journal of Oral Microbiology, Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact