Sarah E. Wolf

30 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Sarah E. Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Aging 31
  • Ecological Modeling 15
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 66
  • Developmental Biology 7
  • Physiology 62
Replace Stan Braude with:
Stan Braude United States
Milena R. Shattuck United States
Joel L. Pick United Kingdom
Paul Hopwood United Kingdom
Joanna Sudyka Poland
Sara Keeble United States
Susan E. Everingham Australia
Sandra H. South Sweden
Niki Teunissen Australia
Rachel A. Johnston United States
Sarah E. Wolf relative to Stan Braude United States Stan Braude's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Stan Braude · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Wolf. The network helps show where Sarah E. Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah E. Wolf Line = papers co-authored together Sarah E. Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201099
2 202342
3 201136
4 202133
5 201026
6 201922
7 202417
8 201715
9 202313
10 202112
11 202311
12 202110
13 20249
14 20219
15 20119
16 20218
17 20217
18 20227
19 20236
20 20233

About Sarah E. Wolf

Sarah E. Wolf is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Physiology, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (7 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (6 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (6 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (2 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (2 papers) and Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (31 citations), Ecological Modeling (15 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (66 citations), Developmental Biology (7 citations) and Physiology (62 citations). Sarah E. Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include R. Kelly Dawe, Gernot G. Presting, John M. Burke, Jinghua Shi, Jeffrey Ross‐Ibarra, Kimberly A. Rosvall, Idan Shalev, Albert Zeyer, Waylon J. Hastings and Qiaofeng Ye. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Avian Biology, Animal Behaviour, Epigenetics, Ecology and Evolution and Amphibia-Reptilia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact