Sarah E. Ackermann

8 papers receiving 77 citations

Peers

Sarah E. Ackermann
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 22
  • Toxicology 3
  • Cancer Research 12
  • Reproductive Medicine 4
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 3
Replace Fabio Volterra with:
Fabio Volterra United States
Nicola Laurence United Kingdom
Laura Monovich United States
Helena Zhang United States
Adam Kirk United Kingdom
M. Thomas United States
Anne Laure Martin France
Ghassan Ghorayeb United States
Jon Riise Norway
Tobias Suske Austria
Sarah E. Ackermann relative to Fabio Volterra United States Fabio Volterra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Fabio Volterra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Ackermann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Ackermann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Ackermann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Ackermann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Ackermann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Ackermann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Ackermann. The network helps show where Sarah E. Ackermann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah E. Ackermann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah E. Ackermann Line = papers co-authored together Sarah E. Ackermann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 201230
2 200725
3
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: which diagnostic procedures can be used?
200512
4 20008
5 20202
6
Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie. Phase II study of weekly docetaxel in patients with recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer: AGO Uterus-4
20071
7 20211
8 20141
9 20130

About Sarah E. Ackermann

Sarah E. Ackermann is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Research and Small Animals, having authored 9 papers that have together received 80 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (1 paper), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (1 paper), Management of metastatic bone disease (1 paper), Vasculitis and related conditions (1 paper), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (1 paper) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (22 citations), Toxicology (3 citations), Cancer Research (12 citations), Reproductive Medicine (4 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (3 citations). Sarah E. Ackermann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Bogenrieder, Matthias W. Beckmann, Maximilian Posch, Sabine Pankuweit, Andreas Perrot, Bernhard Maisch, Volker Ruppert, Anette Richter, Silke Sperling and Thomas Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cancer, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, European Journal of Human Genetics, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases and Oncology Research and Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact