Sarah D. Cramer

23 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

Sarah D. Cramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Small Animals 42
  • Parasitology 35
  • Immunology 91
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 20
  • Equine 5
Replace Toshihiro Tsukui with:
Toshihiro Tsukui Japan
John A. Gerlach United States
E. Burkhardt Germany
J. M. Angles United States
Simon A. Pot Switzerland
Laura Cavicchioli Italy
Andrea Fuchs‐Baumgartinger Austria
Joanna Kemp United States
Adam O. Michel United States
Mirjam M. Mebius Netherlands
Sarah D. Cramer relative to Toshihiro Tsukui Japan Toshihiro Tsukui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Toshihiro Tsukui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah D. Cramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah D. Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah D. Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah D. Cramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah D. Cramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah D. Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah D. Cramer. The network helps show where Sarah D. Cramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah D. Cramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah D. Cramer Line = papers co-authored together Sarah D. Cramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201158
2 196847
3 201635
4 201829
5 201826
6 201922
7 202022
8 201812
9 202210
10 201910
11 20119
12 20218
13 20237
14
Caudal vena caval thrombosis following treatment of deep digital sepsis.
20127
15 20115
16 20235
17 20234
18 20114
19 19684
20 20193

About Sarah D. Cramer

Sarah D. Cramer is a scholar working on Immunology, Small Animals, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Immunotoxicology and immune responses (7 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (6 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (4 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (3 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (2 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (2 papers) and CAR-T cell therapy research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (42 citations), Parasitology (35 citations), Immunology (91 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (20 citations) and Equine (5 citations). Sarah D. Cramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joseph M. Marchello, Scott K. Durum, Peter D. Aplan, Alok Sharma, Mark T. Butt, Gregory A. Campbell, Brad Bolon, Gail Scherba, S. K. Smith and Julie A. Hixon. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicologic Pathology, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, AIChE Journal, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation and Advances in Biological Regulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact