Sara Steegen

8 papers receiving 833 citations

Sara Steegen's Hit Papers

Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis 2016 · 765 citations
7650+3+6Years since publication250500750

Peers

Sara Steegen
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • General Decision Sciences 36
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 112
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 182
  • Applied Psychology 63
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 194
Replace Frederik Aust with:
Frederik Aust Germany
Coosje Lisabet Sterre Veldkamp Netherlands
Samantha F. Anderson United States
Katherine S. Corker United States
Ljiljana B. Lazarević Serbia
Siu L. Chow Canada
Thomas Scherndl Austria
Chris Hartgerink Netherlands
Hilde Elisabeth Maria Augusteijn Netherlands
Malte Elson Germany
Sara Steegen relative to Frederik Aust Germany Frederik Aust's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Frederik Aust · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Steegen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Steegen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Steegen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Steegen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Steegen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Steegen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Steegen. The network helps show where Sara Steegen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Sara Steegen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara Steegen Line = papers co-authored together Sara Steegen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis
Hit paper breakdown →
2016765
2 202035
3 201419
4 200216
5 20126
6 20164
7 20143
8 20171

About Sara Steegen

Sara Steegen is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Ocean Engineering, having authored 8 papers that have together received 849 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (1 paper), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (1 paper), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (1 paper), Memory Processes and Influences (1 paper), Economic and Environmental Valuation (1 paper), Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques (1 paper) and Data Mining Algorithms and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (36 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (112 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (182 citations), Applied Psychology (63 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (194 citations). Sara Steegen has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Francis Tuerlinckx, Wolf Vanpaemel, Andrew Gelman, Jun Qian, Emmanuel Vander Poorten, H. Van Brussel, Wim De Neys, Dominiek Reynaerts, Helena Matute and Miguel A. Vadillo. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Methods, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Journal of Mathematical Psychology and Perspectives on Psychological Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact