Sandra Neate

1.5k citations
74 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Sandra Neate

74 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Sandra Neate
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 635
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 204
  • Clinical Psychology 91
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 46
  • Biological Psychiatry 7
Replace Keryn L. Taylor with:
Keryn L. Taylor Australia
Emily J. Hadgkiss Australia
Karen Stadnyk Canada
Naresh G. Pereira Australia
Alicia P. Sloan United States
Gorica Marić Serbia
Jeanette A. Stewart United States
So Youn Park South Korea
Konstanze Fendrich Germany
Wenlan Dong China
Sandra Neate relative to Keryn L. Taylor Australia Keryn L. Taylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Keryn L. Taylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Neate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Neate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Neate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Neate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Neate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Neate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Neate. The network helps show where Sandra Neate may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandra Neate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra Neate Line = papers co-authored together Sandra Neate links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016119
2 201672
3 201759
4 201644
5 201843
6 201842
7 201637
8 201233
9 201530
10 201830
11 201429
12 201827
13 202124
14 201821
15 202021
16 201220
17 201219
18 202118
19 201618
20 202118

About Sandra Neate

Sandra Neate is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Surgery and General Health Professions, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (48 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (12 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (3 papers), Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (2 papers) and T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (635 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (204 citations), Clinical Psychology (91 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (46 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (7 citations). Sandra Neate has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include George A Jelinek, Tracey Weiland, Claudia H. Marck, Keryn L. Taylor, Alysha De Livera, Steve Simpson, Chelsea R. Brown, Nupur Nag, Bernadette B. Hickey and Jeanette C. Reece. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, European Journal of Neurology, Frontiers in Neurology, Journal of Medical Internet Research and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact