Samuel Proger

26 papers receiving 212 citations

Peers

Samuel Proger
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 86
  • Internal Medicine 8
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 35
  • Surgery 89
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 63
Replace H. W. Fullerton with:
H. W. Fullerton United Kingdom
H. Nieth Germany
C. Olivetti Italy
Hiroo Miyagi Japan
Wojciech Sobiczewski Poland
Thai Ac Singapore
Pio Cialdella Italy
Á. Blanco-Molina Spain
J.-P. Baguet France
B Janand-Delenne France
Samuel Proger relative to H. W. Fullerton United Kingdom H. W. Fullerton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
H. W. Fullerton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Samuel Proger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel Proger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel Proger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel Proger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel Proger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel Proger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel Proger. The network helps show where Samuel Proger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Samuel Proger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Samuel Proger Line = papers co-authored together Samuel Proger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196154
2 196353
3 195939
4 195426
5 196216
6 196015
7 19648
8 19668
9 19758
10 19715
11 19585
12 19634
13 19714
14
[CEPHALINS IN THE BLOOD OF NORMAL PERSONS AND OF THOSE SUFFERING FROM ATHEROSCLEROSIS OF THE CORONARY ARTERIES].
19654
15 19724
16 19653
17 19513
18
The medicated society
19682
19
The acute and chronic phases of coronary atherosclerosis.
19512
20 19722

About Samuel Proger

Samuel Proger is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery, having authored 30 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (2 papers), Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (2 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (2 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (2 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (2 papers) and Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (86 citations), Internal Medicine (8 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (35 citations), Surgery (89 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (63 citations). Samuel Proger has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert H. Goldstein, Shapur Naimi, Benjamin E. Etsten, Eliot Young, I. N. ROSENBERG, George F. Wilgram and Gordon M. Wyant. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Circulation, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, The American Journal of Medicine and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact