Samuel Lloyd
Impact in
- Genetics top 5%
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer
-
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Papers in
- Genetics 5
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer 5
-
- Family Support in Illness 3
- Co-authors
- Rosalind A. Eeles (4 shared papers)S. Ebbs (2 shared papers)Laurence Meyer (2 shared papers)Maggie Watson (4 shared papers)Victoria Murday (3 shared papers)J. Davidson (1 shared paper)Margaret Watson (1 shared paper)André Tylee (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psycho-Oncology (3 papers)British Journal of Cancer (2 papers)Journal of Environmental Psychology (1 paper)Journal of Pediatric Psychology (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandCanada
In The Last Decade
Samuel Lloyd
8 papers receiving 510 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Genetics 362
- Applied Psychology 31
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 98
- Sociology and Political Science 172
- Oncology 89
Countries citing papers authored by Samuel Lloyd
This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel Lloyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel Lloyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel Lloyd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel Lloyd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel Lloyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel Lloyd. The network helps show where Samuel Lloyd may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Samuel Lloyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 202 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 180 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 62 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 24 | |
| 7 | Clinical experiences for freshmen and sophomore medical students. An educational innovation. | 1974 | 3 |
| 8 | 1996 | 1 |
About Samuel Lloyd
Samuel Lloyd is a scholar working on Genetics, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper), Medical Education and Admissions (1 paper) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (362 citations), Applied Psychology (31 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (98 citations), Sociology and Political Science (172 citations) and Oncology (89 citations). Samuel Lloyd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rosalind A. Eeles, S. Ebbs, Laurence Meyer, Maggie Watson, Victoria Murday, J. Davidson, Margaret Watson, André Tylee, Robert Gifford and N Sacks. Their work appears in journals such as Psycho-Oncology, British Journal of Cancer, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Journal of Pediatric Psychology and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.