Samuel Freeman

6.9k citations
37 papers · 1.1k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Samuel Freeman

29 papers receiving 936 citations

Peers

Samuel Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Political Science and International Relations 683
  • Philosophy 293
  • Law 146
  • Sociology and Political Science 481
  • Public Administration 23
Replace Thomas Hobbes with:
Thomas Hobbes
John T. Granrose United States
Hillel Steiner United Kingdom
Robert Paul Wolff United States
Larry May United States
Hugo Adam Bedau United States
Christine Pierce United States
Brian Leiter United States
Tommie Shelby United States
Joseph H. Carens Canada
Samuel Freeman relative to Thomas Hobbes Thomas Hobbes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Thomas Hobbes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Samuel Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel Freeman. The network helps show where Samuel Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Samuel Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Samuel Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Samuel Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002274
2 2002270
3 2000132
4 200183
5 201154
6 199046
7 201145
8 200632
9 199422
10 201318
11 201017
12 200715
13
Public Reason and Political Justifications
200414
14 199413
15
Frontiers of Justice: The Capabilities Approach vs. Contractarianism
200612
16
Political Liberalism and the Possibilty of a Just Democratic Constitution
199411
17 199111
18
Original meaning, democratic interpretation, and the constitution
199210
19 201810
20 20187

About Samuel Freeman

Samuel Freeman is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Cognitive Neuroscience, Law, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (16 papers), Free Will and Agency (6 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers) and Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (683 citations), Philosophy (293 citations), Law (146 citations), Sociology and Political Science (481 citations) and Public Administration (23 citations). Samuel Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Charles Larmore, Thomas H. Nagel, Martha C. Nussbaum, Norman Daniels, Amy Gutmann, Samuel Scheffler, Joshua Cohen, Frank I. Michelman, Onora O’Neill and Philippe Van Parijs. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy & Public Affairs, Social Philosophy and Policy, The Journal of Philosophy, Politics Philosophy & Economics and Texas law review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact