Samuel E. Ford

27 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers

Samuel E. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Otorhinolaryngology 297
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 144
  • Rehabilitation 72
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 46
  • Surgery 65
Replace Alberto Crimì with:
Alberto Crimì Italy
Valerie L. Schade United States
Jacob J. Triplet United States
Erdal Uzun Türkiye
Kenan Araz Türkiye
David T. Loveday United Kingdom
James D. OʼHolleran United States
Turan Bilge Kızkapan Türkiye
Fırat Ozan Türkiye
James Katsaros Australia
Samuel E. Ford relative to Alberto Crimì Italy Alberto Crimì's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×17.5×
Alberto Crimì · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Samuel E. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel E. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel E. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel E. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel E. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel E. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel E. Ford. The network helps show where Samuel E. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Samuel E. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Samuel E. Ford Line = papers co-authored together Samuel E. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013172
2 201385
3 201866
4 201462
5 201745
6 201745
7 201840
8 202115
9 201914
10 202211
11 201610
12 202110
13 20197
14 20216
15 20226
16 20224
17 20163
18 20223
19 20243
20 20243

About Samuel E. Ford

Samuel E. Ford is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology, Rehabilitation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Surgery, having authored 33 papers that have together received 623 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Foot and Ankle Surgery (20 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (3 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (3 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (3 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (2 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (1 paper) and Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (297 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (144 citations), Rehabilitation (72 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (46 citations) and Surgery (65 citations). Samuel E. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Jeffery Scott Magnuson, Eben Lloyd Rosenthal, William R. Carroll, Brian P. Scannell, F. Christopher Holsinger, John Kent Ellington, Eric J. Moore, Tamer Ghanem, Benjamin F. Bush and Larissa Sweeny. Their work appears in journals such as Foot & Ankle International, JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery and The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact