Sam Ford

3.0k citations
15 papers · 1.0k · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Sam Ford

14 papers receiving 853 citations

Sam Ford's Hit Papers

Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture 2014 · 917 citations
9170+4+8Years since publication250500750

Peers

Sam Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Communication 368
  • Gender Studies 178
  • Sociology and Political Science 474
  • Literature and Literary Theory 121
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 50
Replace Geert Lovink with:
Geert Lovink Netherlands
Melissa A. Click United States
Jonathan Dovey United Kingdom
Theresa M. Senft United States
Klaus Bruhn Jensen Denmark
Seth Giddings United Kingdom
James Meese Australia
Ted Striphas United States
Annette Hill United Kingdom
Iain Hamilton Grant United Kingdom
Sam Ford relative to Geert Lovink Netherlands Geert Lovink's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Geert Lovink · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sam Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Ford. The network helps show where Sam Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Sam Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sam Ford Line = papers co-authored together Sam Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1
Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture
Hit paper breakdown →
2014917
2 201830
3 201421
4 20209
5 20218
6 20184
7 20084
8 20192
9 20222
10 20141
11
20081
12 20101
13 20171
14 20181
15 20180

About Sam Ford

Sam Ford is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Cultural Studies, Molecular Biology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (5 papers), Media Studies and Communication (4 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (3 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (1 paper), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (1 paper) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (368 citations), Gender Studies (178 citations), Sociology and Political Science (474 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (121 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (50 citations). Sam Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joshua Green, Henry Jenkins, Melissa A. Click, Kristina Busse, Paul Booth, Xiaochang Li, Joonyoung Kim, Duen Horng Chau, J. Peter W. Young and Ellie Harrison. Their work appears in journals such as Cinema Journal, Frontiers in Microbiology, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Journal of digital & social media marketing. and Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact