Sam D. Stout

1.8k citations
43 papers · 1.1k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Sam D. Stout

41 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Sam D. Stout
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Archeology 768
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 339
  • Paleontology 151
  • Geometry and Topology 173
  • Anthropology 113
Replace Vladimı́r Sládek with:
Vladimı́r Sládek Czechia
Dennis P. Van Gerven United States
Carme Rissech Spain
Christian M. Crowder United States
Margit Berner Austria
Efthymia Nikita Cyprus
Heather M. Garvin United States
Sébastien Villotte France
Robert R. Paine United States
D. Troy Case United States
Sam D. Stout relative to Vladimı́r Sládek Czechia Vladimı́r Sládek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Vladimı́r Sládek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sam D. Stout

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sam D. Stout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam D. Stout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam D. Stout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sam D. Stout

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam D. Stout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam D. Stout. The network helps show where Sam D. Stout may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sam D. Stout, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sam D. Stout Line = papers co-authored together Sam D. Stout links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992142
2 199980
3 201466
4 201153
5 199553
6 199952
7 201144
8 200539
9 201237
10 199435
11 201635
12 197633
13 201133
14 201230
15 201229
16
Use of Histology in Ancient Bone Research
197928
17 198228
18 200627
19 199127
20 201527

About Sam D. Stout

Sam D. Stout is a scholar working on Archeology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Geometry and Topology, Genetics and Surgery, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (27 papers), Paleopathology and ancient diseases (15 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (14 papers), Morphological variations and asymmetry (10 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (8 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (6 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (5 papers) and Body Composition Measurement Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (768 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (339 citations), Paleontology (151 citations), Geometry and Topology (173 citations) and Anthropology (113 citations). Sam D. Stout has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert R. Paine, Alexander G. Robling, Amanda M. Agnew, Paul W. Sciulli, Giuseppe Vercellotti, Rosa Boano, Steven L. Teitelbaum, Vera Tiesler, Thomas A. Bishop and Christian M. Crowder. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Calcified Tissue International, Journal of Forensic Sciences, The Anatomical Record and International Journal of Osteoarchaeology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact