S. Ide

5.9k citations
107 papers · 2.6k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

S. Ide

107 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

S. Ide
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.5k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.0k
  • Aerospace Engineering 752
  • Materials Chemistry 1.1k
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.0k
Replace N. Oyama with:
N. Oyama Japan
A. Isayama Japan
A.W. Hyatt United States
M. A. Makowski United States
T. Ozeki Japan
T. Oikawa Japan
W. A. Houlberg United States
X. Litaudon France
D. Gates United States
R. Prater United States
S. Ide relative to N. Oyama Japan N. Oyama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
N. Oyama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Ide

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Ide's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Ide with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Ide more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Ide

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Ide. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Ide. The network helps show where S. Ide may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Ide, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Ide Line = papers co-authored together S. Ide links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997226
2 2000134
3 2001105
4 2005104
5 2001102
6 199990
7 201182
8 200278
9 200164
10 200462
11 199857
12 198655
13 200547
14 200145
15 200344
16 202142
17 200938
18 201438
19 200937
20 200537

About S. Ide

S. Ide is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 107 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (105 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (62 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (59 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (28 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (23 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (18 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (5 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.5k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.0k citations), Aerospace Engineering (752 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.1k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (1.0k citations). S. Ide has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Takao Fujita, Yoshihiro Kamada, A. Isayama, Y. Sakamoto, T. Suzuki, Y. Koide, Hiroshi Shirai, T. Oikawa, O. Naito and N. Oyama. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Physical Review Letters, Fusion Engineering and Design and Journal of Nuclear Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact