Ryan Forster

17 papers receiving 907 citations

Peers

Ryan Forster
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Nephrology 242
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 287
  • Molecular Medicine 36
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 105
  • Biological Psychiatry 15
Replace Zhen Gu with:
Zhen Gu China
Yuehong Li China
Hanwen Li China
Makiko Nakamura Japan
Roberto Zonefrati Italy
Linhe Lu China
Zhiye Wu China
Kenneth D. Gardner United States
Zhonghui Liu China
Tzu‐Hung Lin Taiwan
Ryan Forster relative to Zhen Gu China Zhen Gu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.1×
Zhen Gu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ryan Forster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ryan Forster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ryan Forster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ryan Forster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ryan Forster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ryan Forster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ryan Forster. The network helps show where Ryan Forster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ryan Forster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ryan Forster Line = papers co-authored together Ryan Forster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2010150
2 2011146
3 2011121
4 201090
5 201275
6 201372
7 201472
8 200854
9 201846
10 202134
11
The incorporation of extracellular matrix proteins in protein polymer hydrogels to improve encapsulated beta-cell function.
201333
12 200916
13 200713
14 200810
15 20192
16 20251
17 20141

About Ryan Forster

Ryan Forster is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Nephrology and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 17 papers that have together received 936 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (4 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (4 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (4 papers), Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies (3 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Digital Holography and Microscopy (2 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (2 papers) and Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (242 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (287 citations), Molecular Medicine (36 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (105 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (15 citations). Ryan Forster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and India. Frequent co-authors include Peter W. Jurutka, Mark R. Haussler, Jui‐Cheng Hsieh, G. Kerr Whitfield, Carol A. Haussler, Ichiro Kaneko, Annelise E. Barron, Nicolynn E. Davis, Daniel M. Pinkas and Sheng Ding. Their work appears in journals such as Electrophoresis, Stem Cell Reports, The EMBO Journal, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact