Ruth Eley
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 1%
- Nursing care and research
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Papers in
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 10
-
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 4
- Resilience and Mental Health 1
- Co-authors
- Hilary Tetlow (9 shared papers)Clarissa Marie Giebel (9 shared papers)Mark Gabbay (8 shared papers)Kerry Louise Hanna (8 shared papers)Aravind Komuravelli (8 shared papers)Justine Shenton (7 shared papers)Manoj Rajagopal (7 shared papers)Steve Callaghan (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (2 papers)Aging & Mental Health (2 papers)Dementia (1 paper)Health Expectations (1 paper)BMC Geriatrics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Ruth Eley
14 papers receiving 705 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Pharmacy 177
- Psychiatry and Mental health 347
- Clinical Psychology 230
- General Health Professions 176
- Demography 50
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Eley
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Eley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Eley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Eley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Eley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Eley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Eley. The network helps show where Ruth Eley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Eley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 226 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 142 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 78 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 70 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 68 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 3 |
About Ruth Eley
Ruth Eley is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy, General Health Professions and Demography, having authored 14 papers that have together received 721 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), Nursing care and research (2 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Communication and COVID-19 Impact (1 paper), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (1 paper) and Resilience and Mental Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (177 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (347 citations), Clinical Psychology (230 citations), General Health Professions (176 citations) and Demography (50 citations). Ruth Eley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Hilary Tetlow, Clarissa Marie Giebel, Mark Gabbay, Kerry Louise Hanna, Aravind Komuravelli, Justine Shenton, Manoj Rajagopal, Steve Callaghan, Carol E. Rogers and Kym Ward. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Aging & Mental Health, Dementia, Health Expectations and BMC Geriatrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.