Ruth E. Dunkle

73 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Ruth E. Dunkle
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 106
  • Pharmacy 112
  • General Health Professions 446
  • Health 154
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 348
Replace Tami Saito with:
Tami Saito Japan
Jennifer C. Cornman United States
Heehyul E. Moon United States
Stephanie MacLeod United States
RUTH B. WALKER Australia
Simone Croezen Netherlands
Elizabeth K. Tanner United States
Jorunn Drageset Norway
Molly M. Perkins United States
Hui‐Chuan Hsu Taiwan
Ruth E. Dunkle relative to Tami Saito Japan Tami Saito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Tami Saito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. Dunkle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. Dunkle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. Dunkle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. Dunkle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. Dunkle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. Dunkle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. Dunkle. The network helps show where Ruth E. Dunkle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth E. Dunkle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth E. Dunkle Line = papers co-authored together Ruth E. Dunkle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201583
2 201273
3 200967
4 201360
5 201354
6 201350
7 199446
8 200441
9 198240
10 201338
11 198835
12 199634
13 202034
14 199829
15 200629
16 201029
17 200628
18 198926
19 201724
20 200223

About Ruth E. Dunkle

Ruth E. Dunkle is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (27 papers), Aging, Health, and Disability (22 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (19 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (11 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (11 papers), Nursing care and research (7 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (106 citations), Pharmacy (112 citations), General Health Professions (446 citations), Health (154 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (348 citations). Ruth E. Dunkle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Amanda J. Lehning, Sojung Park, Claudia J. Coulton, Sheila Feld, Huei‐Wern Shen, Jacqui Smith, Tracy A. Schroepfer, Yoonsun Han, BoRin Kim and Min Hee Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Gerontological Social Work, The Gerontologist, Research on Aging, Health & Social Work and Journal of Aging and Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact