Ruth Bennett

10 papers receiving 19 citations

Peers

Ruth Bennett
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Linguistics and Language 14
  • Literature and Literary Theory 13
  • Language and Linguistics 10
  • Human-Computer Interaction 3
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 1
Replace Arab World English Journal with:
Arab World English Journal United States
Ceridwen Lloyd‐Morgan United Kingdom
Joseph T. Shipley United States
Frederick S. Boas United States
Lin Yutang United States
Thomas A. Knott United States
Jamie C. Fumo United States
Marged Haycock
Donald Goddard Wing
Charles Grivel Germany
Ruth Bennett relative to Arab World English Journal United States Arab World English Journal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Arab World English Journal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Bennett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Bennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Bennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Bennett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Bennett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Bennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Bennett. The network helps show where Ruth Bennett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Bennett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Bennett Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Bennett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1
Saving a Language with Computers, Tape Recorders, and Radio.
20036
2 20214
3 20214
4 19903
5
The Place of Writing in Preserving an Oral Language.
19993
6
Cooperative Learning with a Computer in a Native Language Class.
19873
7
Teaching Reading with Puppets.
20023
8
It Really Works: Cultural Communication Proficiency.
19972
9 19851
10
How Much Theory, How Much Practice
19861
11 19851
12 19871
13 19850
14 19870
15
Hupa Nature Coloring Book.
19840
16
Basketmaking among the Karuk.
19840

About Ruth Bennett

Ruth Bennett is a scholar working on Education, Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language, Literature and Literary Theory and Plant Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 32 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Second Language Learning and Teaching (2 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (2 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (2 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (1 paper), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (1 paper), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper), Reading and Literacy Development (1 paper) and Eurasian Exchange Networks (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (14 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (13 citations), Language and Linguistics (10 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (3 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (1 citation). Ruth Bennett has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Clark A. Meyer, Harold A. Campbell, Stefano Leonardi, Habib Samady, Heather N. Hayenga, David Molony and Umberto Ciri. Their work appears in journals such as The Gerontologist, Tropical Animal Health and Production, Scientific Reports, International Journal of Wildland Fire and Hispania.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact