Rupert Freeman

948 citations
41 papers · 641 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Rupert Freeman

39 papers receiving 630 citations

Peers

Rupert Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Economics and Econometrics 536
  • Management Science and Operations Research 64
  • Safety Research 21
  • Computer Science Applications 8
  • Information Systems 25
Replace David Kurokawa with:
David Kurokawa United States
Omer Lev Israel
Erel Segal-Halevi Israel
Abraham Othman United States
Warut Suksompong Singapore
John K. Lai United States
Alexandros A. Voudouris United Kingdom
Markus Brill Germany
Tadeusz Radzik Poland
Swaprava Nath India
Rupert Freeman relative to David Kurokawa United States David Kurokawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
David Kurokawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rupert Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rupert Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rupert Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rupert Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rupert Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rupert Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rupert Freeman. The network helps show where Rupert Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rupert Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rupert Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Rupert Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017178
2 201787
3 201942
4 201930
5 201928
6 201726
7 201622
8 201721
9 202021
10 201518
11 202316
12 201513
13 202213
14 201511
15 202111
16 20149
17 20189
18 20178
19 20208
20 20167

About Rupert Freeman

Rupert Freeman is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Computer Science Applications, Artificial Intelligence and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 41 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Voting Systems (37 papers), Game Theory and Applications (9 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (5 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (3 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (1 paper) and Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (536 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (64 citations), Safety Research (21 citations), Computer Science Applications (8 citations) and Information Systems (25 citations). Rupert Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Vincent Conitzer, Nisarg Shah, Markus Brill, Haris Aziz, Edith Elkind, Toby Walsh, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, David M. Pennock, Rohit Vaish and Dominik Peters. Their work appears in journals such as Management Science, Social Choice and Welfare, Mathematical Programming, Journal of Economic Theory and Operations Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact