Rupert Freeman

919 citations
38 papers · 513 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Rupert Freeman

36 papers receiving 507 citations

Peers

Rupert Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Management Science and Operations Research 289
  • Economics and Econometrics 383
  • Safety Research 61
  • General Decision Sciences 13
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 87
Replace David Kurokawa with:
David Kurokawa United States
Alexandros A. Voudouris United Kingdom
Jordi Massó Spain
Omer Lev Israel
Dominik Peters United Kingdom
Markus Brill Germany
Georgios Amanatidis United Kingdom
Warut Suksompong Singapore
Peter Troyan United States
Gilbert Laffond France
Rupert Freeman relative to David Kurokawa United States David Kurokawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
David Kurokawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rupert Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rupert Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rupert Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rupert Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rupert Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rupert Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rupert Freeman. The network helps show where Rupert Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rupert Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rupert Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Rupert Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017147
2 201774
3 201933
4 201925
5 201723
6 201621
7 201519
8 201718
9 202017
10 202313
11 202212
12 201512
13 20189
14 20148
15 20178
16 20177
17 20167
18 20157
19 20206
20 20166

About Rupert Freeman

Rupert Freeman is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 38 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auction Theory and Applications (25 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (21 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (12 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (8 papers), Game Theory and Applications (6 papers), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (289 citations), Economics and Econometrics (383 citations), Safety Research (61 citations), General Decision Sciences (13 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (87 citations). Rupert Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Vincent Conitzer, Markus Brill, Nisarg Shah, Haris Aziz, Edith Elkind, Toby Walsh, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, David M. Pennock, Lirong Xia and Svante Janson. Their work appears in journals such as Management Science, Social Choice and Welfare, Mathematical Programming, Operations Research and Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact