Ruling Chen

678 citations
35 papers · 580 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Ruling Chen

34 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers

Ruling Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Biomedical Engineering 397
  • Materials Chemistry 405
  • Mechanical Engineering 239
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 155
  • Ceramics and Composites 26
Replace Tianye Jin with:
Tianye Jin China
Fangli Duan China
Fernand Marquis United States
Guoshun Pan China
Qiufa Luo China
Stephen R. Goodes United Kingdom
N. Trannoy France
Jan Očenášek Czechia
Ruling Chen relative to Tianye Jin China Tianye Jin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26×
Tianye Jin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruling Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruling Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruling Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruling Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruling Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruling Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruling Chen. The network helps show where Ruling Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruling Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruling Chen Line = papers co-authored together Ruling Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201249
2 201745
3 201744
4 201837
5 200833
6 201033
7 201130
8 202128
9 201128
10 201125
11 201421
12 202220
13 202417
14 201216
15 201015
16 201514
17 200812
18 201511
19 201811
20 200811

About Ruling Chen

Ruling Chen is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 580 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (29 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (25 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Advanced machining processes and optimization (8 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (6 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (2 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (2 papers) and Glass properties and applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (397 citations), Materials Chemistry (405 citations), Mechanical Engineering (239 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (155 citations) and Ceramics and Composites (26 citations). Ruling Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China. Frequent co-authors include Hong Lei, Shaoxian Li, Xinchun Lu, Jianbin Luo, Hong Lei, Dan Guo, Min Liang, Yitian Peng, Kun Zou and Xing’an Cao. Their work appears in journals such as Thin Solid Films, Tribology International, Applied Surface Science, International Journal of Abrasive Technology and Friction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact