Ruina Yang

586 citations
16 papers · 448 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Biomaterials top 10%
    • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Papers in

Ruina Yang

16 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

Ruina Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Oral Surgery 58
  • Biomaterials 106
  • Hepatology 37
  • Urology 25
  • Cancer Research 53
Replace M. Nagayama with:
M. Nagayama Japan
Hong Hu China
Ylenia Della Rocca Italy
Catherine R. Culberson United States
Yun Ho Jang South Korea
Guangli Ren China
Zeze Fu China
Jinbo Sun China
Chengchao Song China
Ruina Yang relative to M. Nagayama Japan M. Nagayama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.7×
M. Nagayama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruina Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruina Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruina Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruina Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruina Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruina Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruina Yang. The network helps show where Ruina Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruina Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruina Yang Line = papers co-authored together Ruina Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2009122
2 2010108
3 201537
4 201436
5 201629
6 201125
7 202119
8 201416
9 201215
10 202111
11
Mandible ameloblastoma with lung metastasis: a rare case report.
201510
12 20209
13 20147
14 20222
15
A case of gastric adenocarcinoma metastasis to the esophagus possibly caused by gastroscopy or gastric reflux.
20151
16 20151

About Ruina Yang

Ruina Yang is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Oral Surgery, having authored 16 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research (2 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (2 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (2 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (2 papers), Metastasis and carcinoma case studies (2 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper) and Liver physiology and pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oral Surgery (58 citations), Biomaterials (106 citations), Hepatology (37 citations), Urology (25 citations) and Cancer Research (53 citations). Ruina Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hong Bu, Yujun Shi, Hongsong Fan, Lijia Cheng, Xiaofeng Lu, Feng Ye, Ji Bao, Huaiqiang Sun, Xi Chen and Li Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B, International Journal of Oncology, Frontiers in Oncology, Biotechnology Letters and Phytotherapy Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact