Rowan Daneels

15 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

Rowan Daneels
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Literature and Literary Theory 67
  • Communication 36
  • Sociology and Political Science 192
  • Human-Computer Interaction 21
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 45
Replace Wannes Ribbens with:
Wannes Ribbens Belgium
Daniel Possler Germany
Alanna Peebles United States
Sonja Baumer United States
Nishtha Lamba United Arab Emirates
Nicholas L. Matthews United States
Fred W. Sanborn United States
Kim B. Walker United States
Christina Olin‐Scheller Sweden
Gila Cohen Zilka Israel
Rowan Daneels relative to Wannes Ribbens Belgium Wannes Ribbens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Wannes Ribbens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rowan Daneels

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rowan Daneels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rowan Daneels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rowan Daneels more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rowan Daneels

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rowan Daneels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rowan Daneels. The network helps show where Rowan Daneels may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Rowan Daneels, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rowan Daneels Line = papers co-authored together Rowan Daneels links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201773
2 202152
3 201723
4 202021
5 202118
6 201818
7 202313
8 20239
9 20238
10 20238
11 20225
12 20224
13 20233
14 20231
15 20181

About Rowan Daneels

Rowan Daneels is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, Gender Studies and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (9 papers), Media Influence and Health (9 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (9 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers), Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior (1 paper) and Sports, Gender, and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (67 citations), Communication (36 citations), Sociology and Political Science (192 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (21 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (45 citations). Rowan Daneels has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas David Bowman, Daniel Possler, Elisa D. Mekler, Heidi Vandebosch, Michel Walrave, Steven Malliet, Antonius J. van Rooij, Jan Van Looy, Wannes Ribbens and Wannes Heirman. Their work appears in journals such as Games and Culture, Media and Communication, Computers in Human Behavior, Current Addiction Reports and Journal of Children and Media.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact