Rosemarijn Looije

35 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Rosemarijn Looije
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Social Psychology 870
  • Human-Computer Interaction 210
  • Applied Psychology 102
  • Artificial Intelligence 574
  • Computer Science Applications 78
Replace Emmanuel Senft with:
Emmanuel Senft United Kingdom
Patrícia Alves‐Oliveira Portugal
Aditi Ramachandran United States
Mary Ellen Foster United Kingdom
Sean Andrist United States
Elizabeth S. Kim United States
André Pereira Portugal
Marek P. Michalowski United States
Carlos Martinho Portugal
Betsy van Dijk Netherlands
Rosemarijn Looije relative to Emmanuel Senft United Kingdom Emmanuel Senft's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Emmanuel Senft · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rosemarijn Looije

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rosemarijn Looije's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosemarijn Looije with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosemarijn Looije more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rosemarijn Looije

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosemarijn Looije. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosemarijn Looije. The network helps show where Rosemarijn Looije may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rosemarijn Looije, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rosemarijn Looije Line = papers co-authored together Rosemarijn Looije links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009212
2 2013135
3 2014125
4 2013105
5 201189
6 201785
7 201167
8 200652
9 201852
10 200846
11 201441
12 201237
13 201636
14 200733
15 201632
16 201129
17 201424
18 201623
19 201023
20 200920

About Rosemarijn Looije

Rosemarijn Looije is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Applied Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (18 papers), AI in Service Interactions (7 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (7 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (6 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (870 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (210 citations), Applied Psychology (102 citations), Artificial Intelligence (574 citations) and Computer Science Applications (78 citations). Rosemarijn Looije has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Neerincx, Fokie Cnossen, Olivier Blanson Henkemans, Joris B. Janssen, Bert P.B. Bierman, Myrthe Lotte Tielman, John-Jules Meyer, Paul E. Baxter, Tony Belpaeme and Joachim de Greeff. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Cognitive Systems Research, International Journal of Social Robotics and Lecture notes in computer science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact