Roman Forker

1.5k citations
67 papers · 1.3k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Roman Forker

66 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Roman Forker
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 533
  • Materials Chemistry 665
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 803
  • Biomedical Engineering 498
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 76
Replace Achim Schöll with:
Achim Schöll Germany
L. Kilian Germany
Piotr Piątkowski Poland
О. В. Молодцова Russia
Daniel Lüftner Austria
Jorge Lobo‐Checa Spain
Guido Fratesi Italy
J. Schiessling Sweden
J. Todd Stuckless Canada
Katsunori Tagami Japan
Roman Forker relative to Achim Schöll Germany Achim Schöll's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Achim Schöll · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roman Forker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roman Forker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roman Forker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roman Forker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roman Forker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roman Forker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roman Forker. The network helps show where Roman Forker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roman Forker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roman Forker Line = papers co-authored together Roman Forker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008102
2 201289
3 200987
4 201560
5 201359
6 201050
7 200839
8 201033
9 201733
10 201327
11 201826
12 201226
13 201225
14 201325
15 201425
16 201525
17 200924
18 201524
19 201724
20 201423

About Roman Forker

Roman Forker is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (36 papers), Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (22 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (19 papers), Graphene research and applications (15 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (13 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (9 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (8 papers) and Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (533 citations), Materials Chemistry (665 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (803 citations), Biomedical Engineering (498 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (76 citations). Roman Forker has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Torsten Fritz, Marco Gruenewald, Matthias Meißner, Thomas Dienel, Christian Wagner, Stefan C. B. Mannsfeld, Christian Loppacher, Félix Otto, Daniel Kasemann and Kläus Müllen. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Physical review. B., Langmuir, ACS Nano and Advanced Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact