Roger Scott

81 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Roger Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Classics 276
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 247
  • Anthropology 294
  • Radiation 146
  • Inorganic Chemistry 235
Replace N. H. Gale with:
N. H. Gale United Kingdom
Ernst Pernicka Germany
G. R. Evans United Kingdom
G. Harbottle United States
Geoff Nowell United Kingdom
Ingrid U. Olsson Sweden
Alfred Priller Austria
M. W. Rowe United States
Kunihiko Kigoshi Japan
P.R.S. Gomes Brazil
Roger Scott relative to N. H. Gale United Kingdom N. H. Gale's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×55.2×
N. H. Gale · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roger Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roger Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roger Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger Scott. The network helps show where Roger Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roger Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roger Scott Line = papers co-authored together Roger Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986185
2 199081
3 200577
4 198570
5 199560
6 198655
7 199453
8
Byzantium and the classical tradition : University of Birmingham, Thirteenth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, 1979
198147
9 198743
10 199241
11 200237
12 200435
13 198735
14 199234
15 197632
16 197925
17 198221
18 199320
19 201820
20 198916

About Roger Scott

Roger Scott is a scholar working on Classics, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 94 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Byzantine Studies and History (21 papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (17 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (15 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (13 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (9 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (8 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (7 papers) and Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (276 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (247 citations), Anthropology (294 citations), Radiation (146 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (235 citations). Roger Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include A.B. MacKenzie, Michael Jeffreys, Elizabeth Jeffreys, Margaret Mullett, W. Russell Alexander, J.A.T. Smellie, R. Eykens, A. Lamberty, J. Pauwels and Peter Kershaw. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Nature, Australian Journal of Public Administration and Journal of Geochemical Exploration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact