Roger Rees
Impact in
- Classics top 5%
- Byzantine Studies and History
- Medieval Literature and History
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
Papers in
- Anthropology 15
- Classical Antiquity Studies 15
-
- Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods 7
- Co-authors
- Robert J. Penella (1 shared paper)Bruce Gibson (1 shared paper)Emma Stafford (1 shared paper)Gesine Manuwald (1 shared paper)Olivier Hekster (1 shared paper)Susan Kerrigan (1 shared paper)Hugh Bowden (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Arethusa (2 papers)The Classical Quarterly (1 paper)Greece and Rome (1 paper)The American Journal of Philology (1 paper)The Journal of Roman Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesPoland
In The Last Decade
Roger Rees
27 papers receiving 114 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Classics 94
- Anthropology 190
- Archeology 109
- Religious studies 37
- History 65
Countries citing papers authored by Roger Rees
This map shows the geographic impact of Roger Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger Rees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roger Rees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger Rees. The network helps show where Roger Rees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Roger Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 80 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 41 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 7 | Roman Rule in Greek and Roman Writing: Double Vision | 2014 | 7 |
| 8 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 11 | Ted Hughes and the classics | 2009 | 3 |
| 12 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 2 |
About Roger Rees
Roger Rees is a scholar working on Anthropology, Organic Chemistry, Classics, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 243 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (15 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (7 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (4 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers) and Historical and Architectural Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (94 citations), Anthropology (190 citations), Archeology (109 citations), Religious studies (37 citations) and History (65 citations). Roger Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Penella, Bruce Gibson, Emma Stafford, Gesine Manuwald, Olivier Hekster, Susan Kerrigan and Hugh Bowden. Their work appears in journals such as Arethusa, The Classical Quarterly, Greece and Rome, The American Journal of Philology and The Journal of Roman Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.