Roger Pearson

2.3k citations
64 papers · 1.5k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Roger Pearson

54 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Roger Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Cell Biology 982
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 538
  • Immunology and Allergy 170
  • Urology 111
  • Dermatology 133
Replace U. W. Schnyder with:
U. W. Schnyder Switzerland
J. R. McMillan United Kingdom
Anthony Quinn United Kingdom
Pamela D. Arora Canada
Joachim Arnemann Germany
Joëlle Vailly France
Gillian E. Westgate United Kingdom
Ahmad S. Teebi Canada
Jill Dixon United Kingdom
Hiva Fassihi United Kingdom
Roger Pearson relative to U. W. Schnyder Switzerland U. W. Schnyder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
U. W. Schnyder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roger Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roger Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roger Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger Pearson. The network helps show where Roger Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roger Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roger Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Roger Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991423
2 1962247
3 197483
4 199475
5 198866
6 196162
7 196751
8 196744
9 198032
10 198431
11 198527
12 199126
13 196524
14 196523
15 198622
16 199322
17
Race, Intelligence and Bias in Academe
199122
18 197421
19 198020
20 195917

About Roger Pearson

Roger Pearson is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Literature and Literary Theory, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Skin and Cellular Biology Research (11 papers), Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (9 papers), French Literature and Poetry (9 papers), French Literature and Criticism (5 papers), Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders (5 papers), French Literature and Critical Theory (5 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (4 papers) and Medical History and Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (982 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (538 citations), Immunology and Allergy (170 citations), Urology (111 citations) and Dermatology (133 citations). Roger Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Virginia P. Sybert, Sidney Hurwitz, Karen A. Holbrook, R.A.J. Eady, Eugene A. Bauer, Andrew N. Lin, Robert A. Briggaman, Nancy B. Esterly, Jo‐David Fine and Lorraine Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Mankind Quarterly, The Modern Language Review and Agribusiness.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact