Roger J. Smith

2.0k citations
56 papers · 1.7k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Roger J. Smith

52 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Roger J. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.5k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 551
  • Materials Chemistry 769
  • Aerospace Engineering 344
  • Biomedical Engineering 456
Replace Hajime Sakakita with:
Hajime Sakakita Japan
F.B. Marcus United Kingdom
Mashenka B. Dimitrova Bulgaria
John L. Lowrance United States
Peter M. McIntyre United States
BOHDAN BIEG Poland
M. Hüber Germany
J. Urbahn Germany
Diktys Stratakis United States
M. Fontanesi Italy
Roger J. Smith relative to Hajime Sakakita Japan Hajime Sakakita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Hajime Sakakita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roger J. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roger J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger J. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roger J. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger J. Smith. The network helps show where Roger J. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roger J. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roger J. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Roger J. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999333
2 1998308
3 1999172
4 199880
5 201962
6 200354
7 202149
8 197547
9 199741
10 199939
11 200636
12 200233
13 199928
14 199126
15 199924
16 197624
17 201222
18 200820
19 200419
20 200518

About Roger J. Smith

Roger J. Smith is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (43 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (16 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (14 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (14 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (13 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (10 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (8 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.5k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (551 citations), Materials Chemistry (769 citations), Aerospace Engineering (344 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (456 citations). Roger J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include T. R. Jarboe, Aaron J. Redd, Brian A. Nelson, Robert G. Bryant, Roger Raman, Valerie Izzo, Johann Lingertat, R. Prentice, R.D Monk and G.J. Marklin. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Physics of Plasmas, Review of Scientific Instruments, Journal of Fusion Energy and Journal of Nuclear Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact