Roderick Chapman

932 citations
25 papers · 367 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Roderick Chapman

21 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers

Roderick Chapman
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Software 110
  • Hardware and Architecture 90
  • Signal Processing 89
  • Information Systems 138
  • Artificial Intelligence 194
Replace Julien Signoles with:
Julien Signoles France
Marius Minea United States
Stefan Schwoon Germany
Moonjoo Kim United States
Lilian Burdy France
Marieke Huisman Netherlands
Susan Eisenbach United Kingdom
Mark G. Pleszkoch United States
Clyde Ruby United States
Julia L. Lawall France
Roderick Chapman relative to Julien Signoles France Julien Signoles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Julien Signoles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roderick Chapman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roderick Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roderick Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roderick Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roderick Chapman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roderick Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roderick Chapman. The network helps show where Roderick Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roderick Chapman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roderick Chapman Line = papers co-authored together Roderick Chapman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002128
2 199641
3 200041
4
Correctness by construction: a manifesto for high integrity software
200633
5 200423
6 200413
7 200010
8 19949
9 19959
10 20248
11 20068
12 20177
13 20147
14 20037
15 20026
16 20014
17 20024
18 20173
19 20072
20 20071

About Roderick Chapman

Roderick Chapman is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Signal Processing, Software and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 25 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Security and Verification in Computing (10 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (10 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (5 papers), Software Engineering Research (4 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (4 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (4 papers), Embedded Systems Design Techniques (3 papers) and Distributed systems and fault tolerance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (110 citations), Hardware and Architecture (90 citations), Signal Processing (89 citations), Information Systems (138 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (194 citations). Roderick Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Estonia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Hall, Andy Wellings, Alan Burns, Jonathan Hammond, R. Baugh, Andrew Ireland, Yannick Moy, Jim Woodcock, Michaël Leuschel and Kristin Yvonne Rozier. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Journal of Automated Reasoning, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Real-Time Systems and IEEE Software.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact