Roberto Lupo

471 citations
65 papers · 246 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Roberto Lupo

53 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

Roberto Lupo
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Health Informatics 10
  • Applied Psychology 12
  • Leadership and Management 3
  • Occupational Therapy 9
  • Clinical Psychology 37
Replace Marko Ćurković with:
Marko Ćurković Croatia
Meng‐Wei Ge China
Reyhaneh Aghajani Iran
Barbara A. Olson‐Bullis United States
Bethany Snyder United States
Parisa Janjani Iran
Shannon Kim United States
Elisa Martinez United States
John Carlos Pedrozo‐Pupo Colombia
Zhimin Yan China
Roberto Lupo relative to Marko Ćurković Croatia Marko Ćurković's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Marko Ćurković · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Lupo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Lupo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Lupo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Lupo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roberto Lupo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Lupo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Lupo. The network helps show where Roberto Lupo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roberto Lupo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roberto Lupo Line = papers co-authored together Roberto Lupo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202219
2 202316
3 202115
4 202115
5 202314
6 202414
7 202113
8 202310
9 202510
10 20219
11 20248
12 20238
13 20188
14 20207
15 20236
16 20225
17 20225
18 20244
19 20233
20 20243

About Roberto Lupo

Roberto Lupo is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 65 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (5 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (3 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (3 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (10 citations), Applied Psychology (12 citations), Leadership and Management (3 citations), Occupational Therapy (9 citations) and Clinical Psychology (37 citations). Roberto Lupo has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Luana Conte, Elsa Vitale, A Calabrò, Ivan Rubbi, Giorgio De Nunzio, Stefano Botti, Giovanna Artioli, Raffaella Massafra, Roberto Latina and Gianluca Pucciarelli. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Applied Sciences, Holistic Nursing Practice, International Journal of Hematology and Advances in Space Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact