Robert Wolfe

22 papers receiving 766 citations

Peers

Robert Wolfe
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Ophthalmology 211
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 241
  • Safety Research 60
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 120
  • Genetics 91
Replace Rigmor C. Baraas with:
Rigmor C. Baraas Norway
Benjamin D. Masella United States
Christopher S. Langlo United States
Melissa A. Wilk United States
Kavitha Ratnam United States
Jungtae Rha United States
William S. Tuten United States
Jasleen K. Jolly United Kingdom
Josh T. Beckham United States
Kaoru Fujinami Japan
Robert Wolfe relative to Rigmor C. Baraas Norway Rigmor C. Baraas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×10×
Rigmor C. Baraas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Wolfe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Wolfe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Wolfe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Wolfe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Wolfe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Wolfe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Wolfe. The network helps show where Robert Wolfe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Wolfe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Wolfe Line = papers co-authored together Robert Wolfe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011182
2 2009171
3 2008107
4 200977
5 200951
6 200850
7 202330
8 202429
9 202425
10 202314
11 202410
12 20248
13 20257
14 19626
15 20255
16 20254
17 19593
18 20252
19
Ex vivo Changes in Retinal Pigment Epithelial Autofluorescence With Light Exposure
20081
20 20241

About Robert Wolfe

Robert Wolfe is a scholar working on Safety Research, Computer Science Applications, Information Systems, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 785 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (9 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Education (5 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (3 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (2 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers) and Ocular and Laser Science Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (211 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (241 citations), Safety Research (60 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (120 citations) and Genetics (91 citations). Robert Wolfe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and China. Frequent co-authors include David R. Williams, William H. Merigan, Jessica I. W. Morgan, Alfredo Dubra, Jennifer J. Hunter, Benjamin D. Masella, Daniel C. Gray, Richard T. Libby, Ying Geng and John G. Flannery. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, BMC Ophthalmology, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction and Journal of the Optical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact