Robert Wolber

1.7k citations
35 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Wolber

35 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Robert Wolber
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Gastroenterology 145
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 267
  • Oncology 366
  • Cancer Research 202
  • Dermatology 91
Replace Vinod B. Shidham with:
Vinod B. Shidham United States
Gregory F. Sterrett Australia
Michael W. Stanley United States
Walid E. Khalbuss United States
Sadok Korbi Tunisia
Mamatha Chivukula United States
Hock-Liew Eng Taiwan
Cornelis A. Seldenrijk Netherlands
L H Sobin United States
Roberta K. Nieberg United States
Robert Wolber relative to Vinod B. Shidham United States Vinod B. Shidham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Vinod B. Shidham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Wolber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Wolber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Wolber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Wolber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Wolber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Wolber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Wolber. The network helps show where Robert Wolber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Wolber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Wolber Line = papers co-authored together Robert Wolber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995229
2 1991181
3 1990124
4 199090
5 199182
6 199344
7 202033
8 202031
9 201631
10 199231
11 198828
12 201828
13 198927
14 199327
15 201627
16 200226
17
Lymphocytic gastritis and giant gastric folds associated with gastrointestinal protein loss.
199125
18 199124
19 199021
20 199518

About Robert Wolber

Robert Wolber is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Epidemiology, Cancer Research and Surgery, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (10 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (4 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (3 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers) and Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (145 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (267 citations), Oncology (366 citations), Cancer Research (202 citations) and Dermatology (91 citations). Robert Wolber has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include David Owen, Hugh James Freeman, Henry F. Frierson, David C. Wilbur, James C. Boyd, Kenneth W. Berean, Douglas W. Franquemont, M. J. Gaffey, Mark R. Wick and Henry D. Appelman. Their work appears in journals such as Human Pathology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Histopathology and Transplantation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact