Robert Witt

2.3k citations
42 papers · 891 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Witt

38 papers receiving 795 citations

Peers

Robert Witt
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Sociology and Political Science 600
  • Economics and Econometrics 349
  • General Decision Sciences 20
  • Gender Studies 95
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 102
Replace Thomas J. Miles with:
Thomas J. Miles United States
Helen Tauchen United States
Gregory DeAngelo United States
Young Hoon Lee South Korea
Robert Ward United Kingdom
Anthony C. Krautmann United States
Tim Friehe Germany
Benjamin Ho United States
Walter McManus United States
Philip O’Keefe United Kingdom
Robert Witt relative to Thomas J. Miles United States Thomas J. Miles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Thomas J. Miles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Witt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Witt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Witt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Witt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Witt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Witt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Witt. The network helps show where Robert Witt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Robert Witt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Witt Line = papers co-authored together Robert Witt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011223
2 199879
3 200071
4 199966
5 199652
6 200048
7 199838
8 199236
9 200732
10 199525
11 200519
12 200617
13 200717
14 201216
15 200715
16 200815
17 201213
18 201911
19 199710
20 200110

About Robert Witt

Robert Witt is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Soil Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 42 papers that have together received 891 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (16 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (10 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (9 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (6 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (6 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (5 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (4 papers) and Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (600 citations), Economics and Econometrics (349 citations), General Decision Sciences (20 citations), Gender Studies (95 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (102 citations). Robert Witt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Barry Reilly, Stephen Machin, Mirko Draca, Nigel Fielding, Alan Clarke, Ann Dryden Witte, Neil Rickman, Tom Kirchmaier, Christian Urban and Robert J. Lemke. Their work appears in journals such as Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Economica, Regional Studies, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics and Journal of Sports Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact