Robert Verheul

1.1k citations
16 papers · 838 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Verheul

16 papers receiving 769 citations

Peers

Robert Verheul
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Clinical Psychology 389
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 116
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 141
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Epidemiology 226
Replace David J. LaPorte with:
David J. LaPorte United States
Matthew J. Worley United States
Vijoy K. Varma India
Miriam H. Cohen United Kingdom
John S. Tamerin United States
Seyed Mohammad Assadi Iran
Jean Endicott United States
Andrew Bethell United Kingdom
Theo G. Broekman Netherlands
Corey R. Roos United States
Robert Verheul relative to David J. LaPorte United States David J. LaPorte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
David J. LaPorte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Verheul

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Verheul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Verheul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Verheul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Verheul

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Verheul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Verheul. The network helps show where Robert Verheul may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Verheul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Verheul Line = papers co-authored together Robert Verheul links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1999337
2 2001203
3 200064
4 200046
5 201142
6 199839
7 200532
8 201217
9 198615
10 198513
11 202210
12 202010
13
Comorbidity of personality disorders and substance use disorders
20044
14 20013
15
Causal pathways between personality pathology and substance use disorders
20052
16 20121

About Robert Verheul

Robert Verheul is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Applied Psychology, Ceramics and Composites and Catalysis, having authored 16 papers that have together received 838 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (9 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper), Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (1 paper) and Catalysts for Methane Reforming (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (389 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (116 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (141 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations) and Epidemiology (226 citations). Robert Verheul has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wim van den Brink, Peter J. Geerlings, Henry R. Kranzler, Bruce J. Rounsaville, James C. Poling, Howard A. Tennen, Maarten W.J. Koeter, Christina Hartgers, Erlene Rosowsky and Sebastiaan P. J. van Alphen. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Psychologist, Journal of Personality Disorders, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation and Alcohol and Alcoholism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact