Robert Stone

68 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Robert Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Human-Computer Interaction 386
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 279
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 163
  • Conservation 42
  • Geology 58
Replace Fabio Bruno with:
Fabio Bruno Italy
João Falcão Carneiro Portugal
Ming Xie China
Daniel James Australia
Kyle Johnsen United States
Kristien Ooms Belgium
Lucio Tommaso De Paolis Italy
Jennifer Brooke United Kingdom
Arzu Çöltekin Switzerland
Karin Laumann Norway
Robert Stone relative to Fabio Bruno Italy Fabio Bruno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.2×
Fabio Bruno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Stone. The network helps show where Robert Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Stone Line = papers co-authored together Robert Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001149
2 2011143
3
Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface.
1999134
4 200486
5 201777
6 196959
7 200157
8 200348
9 200245
10 200145
11 200344
12 200044
13 197442
14 201739
15 201837
16
MIST VR. A laparoscopic surgery procedures trainer and evaluator.
199737
17 201136
18 197034
19 201533
20 201928

About Robert Stone

Robert Stone is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Surgery and Geology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Augmented Reality Applications (10 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (9 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (8 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (7 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (7 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (4 papers) and Digital Games and Media (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (386 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (279 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (163 citations), Conservation (42 citations) and Geology (58 citations). Robert Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rory McCloy, Michael H. Depledge, Chris Sutton, R F McCloy, James B. Wood, Abdus Sattar Chaudhry, Pia Rotshtein, Alex W. Stedmon, William A. Müller and J. J. Lee. Their work appears in journals such as PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Journal of Phycology and Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact